EU AI Act
Pioneer European law that classifies AI by risk, requires documentation and audit. Sets de facto global standards.
Legal frameworks, organizational policies and standards for responsible AI
Technology without regulation produces externalities. Governments, companies and universities need frameworks that ensure AI is developed responsibly. But poorly designed regulation stifles innovation. Our work seeks balance.
We study emerging laws (EU AI Act), ISO technical standards, corporate ethical frameworks and public policies to identify how best to implement trustworthiness at scale.
Emerging norms guiding responsible development
Pioneer European law that classifies AI by risk, requires documentation and audit. Sets de facto global standards.
International standard for AI management systems. Defines audit requirements, risk and compliance.
US executive order on safe AI, with emphasis on transparency and consumer protection.
Corporate policies for responsible AI. Ethics committees, internal audits and principles aligned with values.
Key components of a governance framework
Document design decisions, risk assessments, testing, validation. Complete traceability.
Independent third parties verify compliance. Certification of the AI management system.
Collaboration between industry, government, academia and civil society to establish accepted standards.
Obstacles in harmonization and compliance
Different countries regulate differently. Multinational companies face regulatory conflicts. Need for harmonization.
Regulation is slow, AI is fast. Legal frameworks can become obsolete. Need for regulatory flexibility.
Audits, documentation, certification. Especially burdensome for startups and small actors.
Scenarios where governance and regulatory frameworks make the difference
In the AI Governance and Regulation line of the Trustworthy AI group at IAFER, we research audit frameworks, documentation, and governance aligned with European AI regulations.